Best of #econtwitter - Week of September 18, 2022 [1/3]
Welcome readers old and new to this week’s edition of Best of Econtwitter. Please submit suggestions — very much including your own work! — over email or on Twitter @just_economics.
This is part one of three.
Paper summaries
Who are the winners and losers from inflation?
This may seem a well-established issue in Economics, but surprisingly, there is still some confusion among pundits, central bankers, and academics. A short-🧵that I hope clarifies certain issues
📣The secular decline in rates may not have boosted U.S. fiscal capacity as much as you think, but it definitely has exposed the U.S. Treasury to more interest rate risk. 🧵
based on #BPEA piece brookings.edu/bpea-articles/…
@SVNieuwerburgh @ProfJiang @MindyXiaolan
Thrilled to see this paper with @ramz_53 accepted at @EJ_RES. We find a striking reversal of fortune: countries borrowing at spreads that are *low* given fundamentals are *more* likely to develop economic difficulties (growth slowdowns & debt crises) 1/9
🚨New Paper🚨
Computing Longitudinal Moments for Het. Agent Models
w/@Baxter_VHR
🔗ir.lib.uwo.ca/economicsresrp…
🔹Computing moments with large MonteCarlo simulations is costly
🔹Alternative: Use model's distribution and its evolution
🔹Follow population instead of individuals
🧵👇
nber.org/digest/202209/…
@fang_leon
Many thanks to @nberpubs for featuring our work on inflation hedging properties of major asset classes. We show that separating energy from core inflation is crucial. Yesterday's market reaction to the surprise CPI print is case in point.
1/n
Interesting discussions
Today I want to talk about a comparison of two statistics that, as a young macroeconomist, scares me quite a bit:
Fraction of papers in the AER related to Macro and Monetary: 7.4% (average of 2020 and 2021)
Fraction of JM candidates working in macro monetary (EJM): 24.5%
^without (as always) intending to endorse any views, relatedly this week:
Interesting facts!
A couple of points, related to my research on inequality within/across countries
1) disposable income need not necessarily reflect standard of living, since we know that expenditure rates (consumption/disposable income) vary a lot across the distribution 1/n
John Burn-Murdoch @jburnmurdoch
Oldie-goldie 2007 Berkeley graduation speech by Tom Sargent, the best concise summary of econ I read (12 points)
"Economics is organized common sense. Here is a short list of valuable lessons that our beautiful subject teaches.
1. Many things that are desirable are not feasible.
Seeing a lot of criticism of housing in CPI. Rents in CPI lag market measures. There are 2 sources of this lag. One is arguably desirable, and the other is undesirable. In terms of the first source, market measures are the rents for new leases, which does not reflect prices
Official data series are incredibly important, government stats agencies are incredibly opaque black boxes, and a lot of weird arbitrary stuff goes on inside — so "deep dive into how the sausage is made" is an extremely underrated genre of tweet.
(below is about rents in CPI)
B @BrettMatsumoto
What's the best development economics paper written in the past ~5 years?
(Was just having this conversation with someone, and am now curious to hear other views)
@ATabarrok I have a paper that quotes Groucho Marx and uses him for an example—so we gave the paper the “Marxian Economics” JEL code
^market clearing is the only right answer of course; this newsletter, meanwhile, will always be competitively priced at p = 0 \approx MC