Welcome readers old and new to this week’s (belated, again) edition of Best of Econtwitter. Please submit suggestions — very much including your own work! — over email or on Twitter @just_economics.
Paper summaries
^someone might naively think ‘if economists can explain one thing it should be how prices are set’, but no, pricing is just really really weird and heterogeneous
^and here’s the Hendren thread. They do consider the welfare costs (“burden”) of audits, i.e. getting audited sucks:
^it’s probably in the paper somewhere, but: “What do these $ figure charts look like when expressed as a fraction of tax liability?”
^also there was a golden meme opportunity here
^thread from N Angrist. Also: “Can I just say though that dropping a new working paper the same week as @nhendren82 and co drop their new paper feels like dropping an album the same week as Taylor Swift, lmao.”
^I think the newsletter may have missed this thread when it came out; the paper is out in NBER series this week
^thread from the authors, also, “Overall it's not a bad paper. They mention in the abstract that they chose an LLM-friendly task. But the nuances were unfortunately but unsurprisingly lost in the commentary around the paper”
^inflammatory but the lit review is good
^at best, “NO return to *micro*targeting - targeting using 2 or 4 characteristics was no better than just 1 char”
^🧐
I recently found this substack and have found it to be incredibly useful at keeping up with the latest research as I attempt to start my dissertation. Thank you for all your hard work.