Best of #econtwitter - Week of February 5, 2023: interesting tweets
Welcome readers old and new to this week’s edition of Best of Econtwitter. Please submit suggestions — very much including your own work! — over email or on Twitter @just_economics.
Interesting discussions
We love to believe there are many specialists who enjoy digging through our complex prose.
But consequence of turgid academic writing is we have moved away from text to communicate ideas to presentations. Now on Zoom; papers are rarely read except for final certification.
^might put this at the top of the newsletter once every few months. You’re reading this newsletter instead of PDFs for a reason!
Effectively, our conventions on how to use the most powerful and informationally dense medium have gotten so bad that we have largely moved away from it to a much less efficient medium we actually understand.
Which we now struggle to use remotely!
Econometrica seems to be experimenting with brief author responses to referee reports, prior to editor decisions. Seems cool!
If you submit a paper to the Journal of Public Economics, you are encouraged to include previous referee reports (with your response, if you wish)
sciencedirect.com/journal/journa…
Harvey Lederman @LedermanHarvey
Public bads
This makes me so sad.
Thinking about all the educators who are using Twitter's API in their curriculum/projects, as well as OSS maintainers of Twitter libraries (shoutout to tweepy).
Twitter Dev @TwitterDev
Bad news for academics using Twitter to estimate sentiment!
No more word clouds! #econtwit #fintwit #fintwitter. @lukestein
Twitter to Remove Free API Access in Elon Musk’s Latest Revenue Push - WSJ
Public goods:
TWITTER: After 2/9, you'll be able to collect Twitter data using snscrape for Python, which does not require API credentials. It also supports Facebook, Instagram, Mastodon, Reddit, and Telegram.
Commentary
Fields of science…
…where papers by teams get the most cites relative to solo papers…
…are also fields where teammates are most complementary (in a technical sense; a paper’s cites is more determined by least cited contributor)
(Also, original charts in a twitter thread?!) https://t.co/7nqfZ9v5zN
Lukas Freund @_LukasFreund_
A 🧵 on team production in science 🧪 & academia more generally: on benefits & bottlenecks and the joy when discovering an unexpected empirical result supporting a theoretical conjecture.
^you can and should cite Twitter threads that do original research/analysis 😊
Back in March, Pew published a paper claiming that the U.S. population in multigenerational households quadrupled since 1971. I was skeptical when I saw that, but I didn’t look into it until now. /1
pewresearch.org/social-trends/…
ChatGPT
.@Stata needs to put much more code on the web, e.g. upload all Stata books, if it is to train ChatGPT and stay competitive. blogs.worldbank.org/impactevaluati…
1/ More than 70% of the academic researchers who answered my poll "rarely or never ChatGPT". Perhaps some of you are unaware of how good it is. I use it to assist me with all sorts of tasks, including programming assistance and proofreading. See some actual examples below!
What are the ethical implications of ChatGPT at University? What does ChatGPT have to say for itself? This was our starting discussion for my class “Machine Learning, Text Analysis and Economics” @Brown_Economics.
ChatGPT & Text Analysis: The text-analysis landscape in Econ relies a lot on dictionaries, which can be adhoc in some cases. I started a new proj with @dan_chandler on tech adoption, and used AI to formulate priors (results below). @ellliottt @I_Am_NickBloom @StephenEKHansen
Use ChatGPT on your own files
This is going to be big:
humata.ai lets you upload a .pdf up to 60 pages long and allows you to ask questions about it in plain English ↓