Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Roman's avatar

Re the NBER newsletter thing - they had randomized the paper order in the newsletter, a couple years ago, after a paper came out claiming that papers at the top of the newsletter were cited more often.

It's similar for Best of Econtwitter by the way. The volume feels much like it's #All of Econtwitter! I often end up reading the top links and then scrolling through the remainder in a blur because I'm out of time. I recognize that trimming and sorting by importance would be a lot more cognitive effort, though.

Expand full comment

No posts